<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2014Kunz_SART_OS</id>
	<title>2014Kunz SART OS - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2014Kunz_SART_OS"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2014Kunz_SART_OS&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-24T22:01:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2014Kunz_SART_OS&amp;diff=2604&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>CoSS: Created page with &quot;== Citation ==  Kunz, M. &amp; Frangakis, A. S. Super-sampling SART with ordered subsets. J Struct Biol, 2014, 188, 107-115  == Abstract ==  In tomography, the quality of the reco...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2014Kunz_SART_OS&amp;diff=2604&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-12-29T09:24:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Citation ==  Kunz, M. &amp;amp; Frangakis, A. S. Super-sampling SART with ordered subsets. J Struct Biol, 2014, 188, 107-115  == Abstract ==  In tomography, the quality of the reco...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Citation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kunz, M. &amp;amp; Frangakis, A. S. Super-sampling SART with ordered subsets. J Struct Biol, 2014, 188, 107-115&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In tomography, the quality of the reconstruction is essential because the complete cascade of the subsequent analysis is based on it. To date, weighted back-projection (WBP) has been the most commonly used technique due to its versatility and performance in sub-tomogram averaging. Here we present super-sampling SART that is based on the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique. While algebraic reconstruction techniques typically produce better contrast and lately showed a significant improvement in terms of processing speed, sub-tomogram averages derived from those reconstructions were inferior in resolution compared to those derived from WBP data. Super-sampling SART, however, outperforms both in term of contrast and the resolution achieved in sub-tomogram averaging several other tested methods and in particular WBP. The main feature of super-sampling SART, as the name implies, is the super-sampling option - by which parameter-based up-sampling and down-sampling are used to reduce artifacts. In particular, the aliasing that is omnipresent in the reconstruction can be practically eliminated without a significant increase in the computational time. Furthermore, super-sampling SART reaches convergence within a single iteration, making the processing time comparable to WBP, and eliminating the ambiguity of parameter-controlled convergence times. We find that grouping of projections increases the contrast, while when projections are used individually the resolution can be maximized. Using sub-tomogram averaging of ribosomes as a test case, we show that super-sampling SART achieves equal or better sub-tomogram averaging results than WBP, which is of particular importance in cryo-electron tomography.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Keywords ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25281496&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related software ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related methods ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comments ==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CoSS</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>