<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2024Cameron_REPIC</id>
	<title>2024Cameron REPIC - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2024Cameron_REPIC"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2024Cameron_REPIC&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-24T22:00:36Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2024Cameron_REPIC&amp;diff=4809&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>WikiSysop: Created page with &quot;== Citation ==  C. J. Cameron, S. J. Seager, F. J. Sigworth, H. D. Tagare, and M. B. Gerstein, “REliable PIcking by Consensus (REPIC): a consensus methodology for harnessing multiple cryo-EM particle pickers,” Communications Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1421, 2024.  == Abstract ==  Cryo-EM particle identification from micrographs (“picking”) is challenging due to the low signal-to-noise ratio and lack of ground truth for particle locations. State-of-the-art computa...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2024Cameron_REPIC&amp;diff=4809&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2024-11-08T10:31:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Citation ==  C. J. Cameron, S. J. Seager, F. J. Sigworth, H. D. Tagare, and M. B. Gerstein, “REliable PIcking by Consensus (REPIC): a consensus methodology for harnessing multiple cryo-EM particle pickers,” Communications Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1421, 2024.  == Abstract ==  Cryo-EM particle identification from micrographs (“picking”) is challenging due to the low signal-to-noise ratio and lack of ground truth for particle locations. State-of-the-art computa...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Citation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C. J. Cameron, S. J. Seager, F. J. Sigworth, H. D. Tagare, and M. B. Gerstein, “REliable PIcking by Consensus (REPIC): a consensus methodology for harnessing multiple cryo-EM particle pickers,” Communications Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1421, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cryo-EM particle identification from micrographs (“picking”) is challenging due to the low&lt;br /&gt;
signal-to-noise ratio and lack of ground truth for particle locations. State-of-the-art computational&lt;br /&gt;
algorithms (“pickers”) identify different particle sets, complicating the selection of the best-suited&lt;br /&gt;
picker for a protein of interest. Here, we present REliable PIcking by Consensus (REPIC), a&lt;br /&gt;
computational approach to identifying particles common to the output of multiple pickers. We frame&lt;br /&gt;
consensus particle picking as a graph problem, which REPIC solves using integer linear programming.&lt;br /&gt;
REPIC picks high-quality particles even when the best picker is not known a priori or a protein is&lt;br /&gt;
difficult-to-pick (e.g., NOMPC ion channel). Reconstructions using consensus particles without&lt;br /&gt;
particle filtering achieve resolutions comparable to those fromparticles picked by experts. Our results&lt;br /&gt;
show that REPIC requires minimal (often no) manual intervention, and considerably reduces the&lt;br /&gt;
burden on cryo-EM users for picker selection and particle picking. Availability: https://github.com/&lt;br /&gt;
ccameron/REPIC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Keywords ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-024-07045-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related software ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related methods ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comments ==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysop</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>