<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2026Evans_Counting</id>
	<title>2026Evans Counting - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2026Evans_Counting"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2026Evans_Counting&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-13T22:04:51Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2026Evans_Counting&amp;diff=5185&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>WikiSysop: Created page with &quot;== Citation ==  Evans, L., Dingeldein, L., Covino, R., Gilles, M.A., Thiede, E. and Cossio, P. 2026. Counting particles in cryo-electron microscopy may result in incorrect population estimates. Communications Biology. 9, 1 (2026), 421.  == Abstract ==  Counting particles is a common practice in estimating populations from cryo-electron microscopy data. Here, it is shown that counting particles is not robust to noise, whereas statistically rigorous population-estimation m...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://3demmethods.i2pc.es/index.php?title=2026Evans_Counting&amp;diff=5185&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-04-13T12:33:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Citation ==  Evans, L., Dingeldein, L., Covino, R., Gilles, M.A., Thiede, E. and Cossio, P. 2026. Counting particles in cryo-electron microscopy may result in incorrect population estimates. Communications Biology. 9, 1 (2026), 421.  == Abstract ==  Counting particles is a common practice in estimating populations from cryo-electron microscopy data. Here, it is shown that counting particles is not robust to noise, whereas statistically rigorous population-estimation m...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Citation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evans, L., Dingeldein, L., Covino, R., Gilles, M.A., Thiede, E. and Cossio, P. 2026. Counting particles in cryo-electron microscopy may result in incorrect population estimates. Communications Biology. 9, 1 (2026), 421.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Counting particles is a common practice in estimating populations from cryo-electron microscopy data. Here, it is shown that counting particles is not robust to noise, whereas statistically rigorous population-estimation methods are more resilient and hold promise for future development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Keywords ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-026-09859-6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related software ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related methods ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comments ==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysop</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>