1980Kam AutoCorrelation: Difference between revisions

From 3DEM-Methods
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Citation == == Abstract == == Keywords == == Links == == Related software == == Related methods == == Comments ==")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Citation ==
== Citation ==
Z. Kam, “The reconstruction of structure from electron
micrographs of randomly oriented particles,” Journal of
Theoretical Biology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 15 – 39, 1980.


== Abstract ==
== Abstract ==
If the viewing directions of the projection images are uniformly distributed, then the Fourier projection slice theorem implies that the 3D autocorrelation of the 3D reciprocal space representation of the volume with itself can be estimated from the 2D sample covariance matrix of the Fourier transformed projection images. It follows that the coefficients of the spherical harmonics expansion of the Fourier transformed volume are determined up to orthogonal matrix of size (2l+1)x(2l+1) for each order l.


== Keywords ==
== Keywords ==
Autocorrelation, 2D covariance, spherical harmonics


== Links ==
== Links ==

Latest revision as of 19:33, 18 March 2015

Citation

Z. Kam, “The reconstruction of structure from electron micrographs of randomly oriented particles,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 15 – 39, 1980.

Abstract

If the viewing directions of the projection images are uniformly distributed, then the Fourier projection slice theorem implies that the 3D autocorrelation of the 3D reciprocal space representation of the volume with itself can be estimated from the 2D sample covariance matrix of the Fourier transformed projection images. It follows that the coefficients of the spherical harmonics expansion of the Fourier transformed volume are determined up to orthogonal matrix of size (2l+1)x(2l+1) for each order l.

Keywords

Autocorrelation, 2D covariance, spherical harmonics

Links

Related software

Related methods

Comments