2004Egerton Damage: Difference between revisions

From 3DEM-Methods
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Citation ==
== Citation ==


Harauz G, van Heel M (1986) Exact filters for general geometry three
Egerton RF, Li P, Malac M (2004) Radiation damage in the TEM and
dimensional reconstruction. Optik 73:146–156
SEM. Micron 35:399–409


== Abstract ==
== Abstract ==

Latest revision as of 13:46, 2 April 2009

Citation

Egerton RF, Li P, Malac M (2004) Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. Micron 35:399–409

Abstract

We review the various ways in which an electron beam can adversely affect an organic or inorganic sample during examination in an electron microscope. The effects considered are: heating, electrostatic charging, ionization damage (radiolysis), displacement damage, sputtering and hydrocarbon contamination. In each case, strategies to minimise the damage are identified. In the light of recent experimental evidence, we re-examine two common assumptions: that the amount of radiation damage is proportional to the electron dose and is independent of beam diameter; and that the extent of the damage is proportional to the amount of energy deposited in the specimen.

Keywords

Radiation damage

Links

Article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15120123

Related software

Related methods

Comments