2004Egerton Damage: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Citation == | == Citation == | ||
Egerton RF, Li P, Malac M (2004) Radiation damage in the TEM and | |||
SEM. Micron 35:399–409 | |||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == |
Latest revision as of 13:46, 2 April 2009
Citation
Egerton RF, Li P, Malac M (2004) Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. Micron 35:399–409
Abstract
We review the various ways in which an electron beam can adversely affect an organic or inorganic sample during examination in an electron microscope. The effects considered are: heating, electrostatic charging, ionization damage (radiolysis), displacement damage, sputtering and hydrocarbon contamination. In each case, strategies to minimise the damage are identified. In the light of recent experimental evidence, we re-examine two common assumptions: that the amount of radiation damage is proportional to the electron dose and is independent of beam diameter; and that the extent of the damage is proportional to the amount of energy deposited in the specimen.
Keywords
Radiation damage
Links
Article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15120123