2008Fernandez CARP

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 15:51, 7 August 2009 by Jjfdez (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

J.J. Fernandez, D. Gordon, R. Gordon. Efficient parallel implementation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for electron tomography. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 68:626-640, 2008.

Abstract

Electron tomography (ET) combines electron microscopy and the principles of tomographic imaging in order to reconstruct the three-dimensional structure of complex biological specimens at molecular resolution. Weighted back-projection (WBP) has long been the method of choice since the reconstructions are very fast. It is well known that iterative methods produce better images, but at a very costly time penalty. In this work, it is shown that efficient parallel implementations of iterative methods, based primarily on data decomposition, can speed up such methods to an extent that they become viable alternatives to WBP. Precomputation of the coefficient matrix has also turned out to be important to substantially improve the performance regardless of the number of processors used. Matrix precomputation has made it possible to speed up the block-iterative component averaging (BICAV) algorithm, which has been studied before in the context of computerized tomography (CT) and ET, by a factor of more than 3.7. Component-averaged row projections (CARP) is a recently introduced block-parallel algorithm, which was shown to be a robust method for solving sparse systems arising from partial differential equations. It is shown that this algorithm is also suitable for single-axis ET, and is advantageous over BICAV both in terms of runtime and image quality. The experiments were carried out on several datasets of ET of various sizes, using the blob model for representing the reconstructed object.

Keywords

BICAV; CARP; CAV; Component-averaging; Electron microscopy; Electron tomography; Image reconstruction; Parallel processing; WBP; Weighted back-projection

Links

Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2007.09.003

Related software

Related methods

Comments