2018Cheng BeamShift

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 17:40, 17 April 2019 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Cheng, A.; Eng, E. T.; Alink, L.; Rice, W. J.; Jordan, K. D.; Kim, L. Y.; Potter, C. S. & Carragher, B. High resolution single particle cryo-electron microscop...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Cheng, A.; Eng, E. T.; Alink, L.; Rice, W. J.; Jordan, K. D.; Kim, L. Y.; Potter, C. S. & Carragher, B. High resolution single particle cryo-electron microscopy using beam-image shift. Journal of structural biology, 2018, 204, 270-275

Abstract

Automated data acquisition is used widely for single-particle reconstruction of three-dimensional (3D) volumes of biological complexes preserved in vitreous ice and imaged in a transmission electron microscope. Automation has become integral to this method because of the very large number of particle images required in order to overcome the typically low signal-to-noise ratio of these images. For optimal efficiency, automated data acquisition software packages typically employ some beam-image shift targeting as this method is both fast and accurate (±0.1 µm). In contrast, using only stage movement, relocation to a targeted area under low-dose conditions can only be achieved in combination with multiple iterations or long relaxation times, both reducing efficiency. Nevertheless it is well known that applying beam-image shift induces beam-tilt and with it a potential structure phase error with a phase error π/4 the highest acceptable value. This theory has been used as an argument against beam-image shift for high resolution data collection. Nevertheless, in practice many small beam-image shift datasets have resulted in 3D reconstructions beyond the π/4 phase error limit. To address this apparent contradiction, we performed cryo-EM single-particle reconstructions on a T20S proteasome sample using applied beam-image shifts corresponding to beam tilts from 0 to 10 mrad. To evaluate the results we compared the FSC values, and examined the water density peaks in the 3D map. We conclude that the phase error does not limit the validity of the 3D reconstruction from single-particle averaging beyond the π/4 resolution limit.

Keywords

Links

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847718301928

Related software

Related methods

Comments