2018Arnold Review

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 05:35, 16 May 2019 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Arnold, S. A.; Müller, S. A.; Schmidli, C.; Syntychaki, A.; Rima, L.; Chami, M.; Stahlberg, H.; Goldie, K. N. & Braun, T. Miniaturizing EM Sample Preparation:...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Arnold, S. A.; Müller, S. A.; Schmidli, C.; Syntychaki, A.; Rima, L.; Chami, M.; Stahlberg, H.; Goldie, K. N. & Braun, T. Miniaturizing EM Sample Preparation: Opportunities, Challenges, and "Visual Proteomics". Proteomics, 2018 , 18 , e1700176

Abstract

This review compares and discusses conventional versus miniaturized specimen preparation methods for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The progress brought by direct electron detector cameras, software developments and automation have transformed transmission cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and made it an invaluable high-resolution structural analysis tool. In contrast, EM specimen preparation has seen very little progress in the last decades and is now one of the main bottlenecks in cryo-EM. Here, we discuss the challenges faced by specimen preparation for single particle EM, highlight current developments, and show the opportunities resulting from the advanced miniaturized and microfluidic sample grid preparation methods described, such as visual proteomics and time-resolved cryo-EM studies.

Keywords

Links

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pmic.201700176

Related software

Related methods

Comments