2021Egelman Review

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 14:18, 12 April 2021 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Egelman, E. H. & Wang, F. Cryo-EM is a powerful tool, but helical applications can have pitfalls. Soft matter, 2021, 17, 3291-3293 == Abstract == In str...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Egelman, E. H. & Wang, F. Cryo-EM is a powerful tool, but helical applications can have pitfalls. Soft matter, 2021, 17, 3291-3293

Abstract

In structural biology, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has emerged as the main technique for determining the atomic structures of macromolecular complexes. This has largely been due to the introduction of direct electron detectors, which have allowed for routinely reaching a near-atomic resolution when imaging such complexes. In chemistry and materials science, the applications of cryo-EM have been much more limited. A recent paper (Z. Li et al., Chemically Controlled Helical Polymorphism In Protein Tubes By Selective Modulation Of Supramolecular Interactions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 19448-19457) has used low resolution cryo-EM to analyze polymorphic helical tubes formed by a tetrameric protein, and has made detailed models for the interfaces between the tetramers in these assemblies. Due to intrinsic ambiguities in determining the correct helical symmetry, we show that many of the models are likely to be wrong. This note highlights both the enormous potential for using cryo-EM, and also the pitfalls possible for helical assemblies when a near-atomic level of resolution is not reached.

Keywords

Links

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/sm/d1sm00282a

Related software

Related methods

Comments