2024Wankowicz qFit

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 05:58, 14 August 2024 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Wankowicz, Stephanie A. / Ravikumar, Ashraya / Sharma, Shivani / Riley, Blake / Raju, Akshay / Hogan, Daniel W. / Flowers, Jessica / van den Bedem, Henry / Keedy, Daniel A. / Fraser, James S. Automated multiconformer model building for X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM. 2024. eLife, Vol. 12, p. RP90606 == Abstract == In their folded state, biomolecules exchange between multiple conformational states that are crucial for their function. Traditional struc...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Wankowicz, Stephanie A. / Ravikumar, Ashraya / Sharma, Shivani / Riley, Blake / Raju, Akshay / Hogan, Daniel W. / Flowers, Jessica / van den Bedem, Henry / Keedy, Daniel A. / Fraser, James S. Automated multiconformer model building for X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM. 2024. eLife, Vol. 12, p. RP90606

Abstract

In their folded state, biomolecules exchange between multiple conformational states that are crucial for their function. Traditional structural biology methods, such as X-ray crystallography and cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), produce density maps that are ensemble averages, reflecting molecules in various conformations. Yet, most models derived from these maps explicitly represent only a single conformation, overlooking the complexity of biomolecular structures. To accurately reflect the diversity of biomolecular forms, there is a pressing need to shift toward modeling structural ensembles that mirror the experimental data. However, the challenge of distinguishing signal from noise complicates manual efforts to create these models. In response, we introduce the latest enhancements to qFit, an automated computational strategy designed to incorporate protein conformational heterogeneity into models built into density maps. These algorithmic improvements in qFit are substantiated by superior Rfree and geometry metrics across a wide range of proteins. Importantly, unlike more complex multicopy ensemble models, the multiconformer models produced by qFit can be manually modified in most major model building software (e.g., Coot) and fit can be further improved by refinement using standard pipelines (e.g., Phenix, Refmac, Buster). By reducing the barrier of creating multiconformer models, qFit can foster the development of new hypotheses about the relationship between macromolecular conformational dynamics and function.

Keywords

Links

https://elifesciences.org/articles/90606

Related software

Related methods

Comments