2025Zhang Benchmark

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 10:17, 27 August 2025 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Zhang, C., Condon, A. and Dao Duc, K. 2025. A comprehensive survey and benchmark of deep learning-based methods for atomic model building from cryo-electron microscopy density maps. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 26, 4 (2025), bbaf322. == Abstract == Advancements in deep learning (DL) have recently led to new methods for automated construction of atomic models of proteins, from single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) density maps. We condu...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Zhang, C., Condon, A. and Dao Duc, K. 2025. A comprehensive survey and benchmark of deep learning-based methods for atomic model building from cryo-electron microscopy density maps. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 26, 4 (2025), bbaf322.

Abstract

Advancements in deep learning (DL) have recently led to new methods for automated construction of atomic models of proteins, from single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) density maps. We conduct a comprehensive survey of these methods, distinguishing between direct model building approaches that only use density maps, and indirect ones that integrate sequence-to-structure predictions from AlphaFold. To evaluate them with better precision, we refine standard existing metrics, and benchmark a subset of representative DL-methods against traditional physics-based approaches using 50 cryo-EM density maps at varying resolutions. Our findings demonstrate that overall, DL-based methods outperform traditional physics-based methods. Our benchmark also shows the benefit of integrating AlphaFold as it improved the completeness and accuracy of the model, although its dependency on available sequence information and limited training data may limit its usage.

Keywords

https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/26/4/bbaf322/8196890

Comments