2025Pintilie QScore

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 10:19, 20 August 2025 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Pintilie, G., Shao, C., Wang, Z., Hudson, B.P., Flatt, J.W., Schmid, M.F., Morris, K., Burley, S.K. and Chiu, W. 2025. Q-score as a reliability measure for protein, nucleic acid, and small molecule atomic coordinate models derived from 3DEM density maps. Structure. D81, (2025), 410–422. == Abstract == Atomic coordinate models are important for the interpretation of 3D maps produced with cryoEM and cryoET (3D electron microscopy; 3DEM). In addition to...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Pintilie, G., Shao, C., Wang, Z., Hudson, B.P., Flatt, J.W., Schmid, M.F., Morris, K., Burley, S.K. and Chiu, W. 2025. Q-score as a reliability measure for protein, nucleic acid, and small molecule atomic coordinate models derived from 3DEM density maps. Structure. D81, (2025), 410–422.

Abstract

Atomic coordinate models are important for the interpretation of 3D maps produced with cryoEM and cryoET (3D electron microscopy; 3DEM). In addition to visual inspection of such maps and models, quantitative metrics can inform about the reliability of the atomic coordinates, in particular how well the model is supported by the experimentally determined 3DEM map. A recently introduced metric, Q-score, was shown to correlate well with the reported resolution of the map for well fitted models. Here, we present new statistical analyses of Q-score based on its application to 10 000 maps and models archived in the EMDB (Electron Microscopy Data Bank) and PDB (Protein Data Bank). Further, we introduce two new metrics based on Q-score to represent each map and model relative to all entries in the EMDB and those with similar resolution. We explore through illustrative examples of proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules how Q-scores can indicate whether the atomic coordinates are well fitted to 3DEM maps and also whether some parts of a map may be poorly resolved due to factors such as molecular flexibility, radiation damage and/or conformational heterogeneity. These examples and statistical analyses provide a basis for how Q-scores can be interpreted effectively in order to evaluate 3DEM maps and atomic coordinate models prior to publication and archiving.

Keywords

https://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2025/08/00/ic5125/index.html

Comments