2016Glaeser HowGood: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "== Citation == Glaeser, R. M. How good can cryo-EM become? Nat Methods, 2016, 13, 28-32 == Abstract == The suddenness with which single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (c..." |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 12:30, 7 January 2016
Citation
Glaeser, R. M. How good can cryo-EM become? Nat Methods, 2016, 13, 28-32
Abstract
The suddenness with which single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has emerged as a method for determining high-resolution structures of biological macromolecules invites the questions, how much better can this technology get, and how fast is that likely to happen? Though we can rightly celebrate the maturation of cryo-EM as a high-resolution structure-determination tool, I believe there still are many developments to look forward to.
Keywords
Links
http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v13/n1/abs/nmeth.3695.html