2011Read

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 10:53, 24 October 2013 by CoSS (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Read, R. J.; Adams, P. D.; Arendall 3rd, W. B.; Brunger, A. T.; Emsley, P.; Joosten, R. P.; Kleywegt, G. J.; Krissinel, E. B.; Lütteke, T.; Otwinowski, Z.; Pe...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Read, R. J.; Adams, P. D.; Arendall 3rd, W. B.; Brunger, A. T.; Emsley, P.; Joosten, R. P.; Kleywegt, G. J.; Krissinel, E. B.; Lütteke, T.; Otwinowski, Z.; Perrakis, A.; Richardson, J. S.; Sheffler, W. H.; Smith, J. L.; Tickle, I. J.; Vriend, G. & Zwart, P. H. A new generation of crystallographic validation tools for the protein data bank. Structure, 2011, 19, 1395-1412

Abstract

This report presents the conclusions of the X-ray Validation Task Force of the worldwide Protein Data Bank (PDB). The PDB has expanded massively since current criteria for validation of deposited structures were adopted, allowing a much more sophisticated understanding of all the components of macromolecular crystals. The size of the PDB creates new opportunities to validate structures by comparison with the existing database, and the now-mandatory deposition of structure factors creates new opportunities to validate the underlying diffraction data. These developments highlighted the need for a new assessment of validation criteria. The Task Force recommends that a small set of validation data be presented in an easily understood format, relative to both the full PDB and the applicable resolution class, with greater detail available to interested users. Most importantly, we recommend that referees and editors judging the quality of structural experiments have access to a concise summary of well-established quality indicators.

Keywords

PDB validation

Links

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22000512

Related software

Related methods

Comments