2014Egelman ambiguity

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 05:32, 10 December 2014 by CoSS (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Egelman, E. H. Ambiguities in helical reconstruction. Elife, 2014, 3 == Abstract == Helical polymers are found throughout biology and account for a substanti...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Egelman, E. H. Ambiguities in helical reconstruction. Elife, 2014, 3

Abstract

Helical polymers are found throughout biology and account for a substantial fraction of the protein in a cell. These filaments are very attractive for three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs due to the fact that projections of these filaments show many different views of identical subunits in identical environments. However, ambiguities exist in defining the symmetry of a helical filament when one has limited resolution, and mistakes can be made. Until one reaches a near-atomic level of resolution, there are not necessarily reality-checks that can distinguish between correct and incorrect solutions. A recent paper in eLife (Xu et al., 2014) almost certainly imposed an incorrect helical symmetry and this can be seen using filament images posted by Xu et al. A comparison between the atomic model proposed and the published three-dimensional reconstruction should have suggested that an incorrect solution was found.

Keywords

Links

http://elifesciences.org/content/3/e04969

Related software

Related methods

Comments