2016Glaeser HowGood

From 3DEM-Methods
Revision as of 12:30, 7 January 2016 by CoSS (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Citation == Glaeser, R. M. How good can cryo-EM become? Nat Methods, 2016, 13, 28-32 == Abstract == The suddenness with which single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (c...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Citation

Glaeser, R. M. How good can cryo-EM become? Nat Methods, 2016, 13, 28-32

Abstract

The suddenness with which single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has emerged as a method for determining high-resolution structures of biological macromolecules invites the questions, how much better can this technology get, and how fast is that likely to happen? Though we can rightly celebrate the maturation of cryo-EM as a high-resolution structure-determination tool, I believe there still are many developments to look forward to.

Keywords

Links

http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v13/n1/abs/nmeth.3695.html

Related software

Related methods

Comments